Skip to main content

Book Review: No Future

Book Review on American English Professor Lee Edelman's book "No Future". This post was written by RBP team member line of flight from Sampaloc Toc.

Be forewarned, I really didn't like American Professor of English Lee Edelman's No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive (of Tufts University). He reduces the symbol of the "child" to "the linchpin of our universal politics of 'reproductive futurism.'"

I found Lauren Berlant's classic Queen of America Goes to Washington City to be spot on in many instances and if you're interested in how popular American culture utilizes the symbol of the child for neocon propaganda, read her book. She predicted through her analysis of Forest Gump, George Bush II's election. If neocons could they would elect a fetus as president and Dick Cheney as vice president. And they got close with George Bush II.

I am not into fetishizing children in an intellectual way or otherwise. Children are children. I think fetishizing children creates the conditions for systemic child molestation in real life, as James Kincaid wrote in Erotic Innocence. I also think that in someways it either exposes an infantilized collective consciousness or a drive to infantilize society. Some have expressed not liking May Bukas Pa on these grounds.

I didn't enjoy Edelman's Freudian style also -- schizo-affective is perhaps the correct word. The only feeling I got from his writing was anger and hate toward children and society's projections on children. If you hate it, you need it (in a unconsciously negative way). His book reminds me of God Hates Fags. When I read No Future, I had not yet seen Children of Men. But he spares no words in expressing his highly intellectual hate for it. In his description, I saw him opposing the symbol of creativity and renewal and calling it pro-natalism and child fetish. He confused the symbol of renewal (as in the birth of something new) with the concrete birth of a child. That was only an intuition when I read his book with a feeling of nausea and the urge to vomit.

I subsequently saw Children of Men -- which I really liked -- and it confirmed what I felt about Edelman's twisted point of view. Edelman is simply wrong. Queer theory doesn't need to assassinate the archetypal struggle for renewal to support a theoretical framework or a safe space for sexual minorities. I don't agree with his main point. The queer is not positioned in opposition to the child. Edelman's simply can't integrate the Child archetype that has apparently appeared in his life with the rest of his psyche. One of the problems of this is that it has made him overly intellectual to the point where he has no feeling in his writing. Perhaps he has a negative mother complex?

Marie von Franz said in Problems of the Feminine in Fairytales:
If the dominant principle of collective consciousness is worn out, then the children would be the promise of the new thing, the new principle[.] The principle of consciousness in a single human being is tiring. There is need for renewal and this is the dangerous moment; one fears the breakdown which is absolutely necessary for renewal, one fears to give up and to be for a short time faced with nothing. But cowardice or ambition in conscious life tend to cling to the old ways and to prevent renewal, and so evil gets in. (p. 119)
Think of it this way, in many stories, the king marries a country/provincial girl. They are to have a child, but the evil step-mother of the girl or someone like that wants to take the child and kill it. The whole story is allowing the child to develop and grow into an adult. I see this motif in a story as the story of renewal of human consciousness. The king represents the dominant way of thinking, which is tired. He marries someone from the country/province (who is not part of the dominant way of thinking) and they produce something new (the king's son who will replace him when he grows up). Yet, there are elements that need to thwart the renewal, like a negative mother complex, represented by an evil step-mother.

Edelman, however, calls the protecting of the child and warding off the threat of elements designed to sabotage this renewal as pro-natalism or part of Berlant's fetus-fetish. He has created a theory which makes him like an evil step-mother. He ends up identifying with the evil step-mother and theorizes that anyone that wants the child to succeed is really thinking like a religious conservative! That is what is so crazy about the book. (I write at length, though, about the point of child fetishing because our culture does have a problem with that. We infantilize and over do it the other way which ends up stopping the maturation process of the psyche.)

I think fetishizing children and the attitude of infantilizing everything and arresting psychological development is a problem. But this does not put children in opposition to a sexual minority. Religious conservatives have attempted to make this case to "save the children" from sexual minorities. Their attempts to oppose children and sexual minorities is their own opposing renewal and change into a new way. They haven't got the monopoly on the symbolism of the child yet Edelman just reacts to that.

I would not recommend buying or reading this book. The version I read was a 208 page paperback published by Duke University Press (December 2004), ISBN-13: 978-0814735855. It is written in English. Don't buy it, it's not worth it, really!

Note: Edited May 15, 2008 at 2:58 AM per Mr. Scheez's request for clarification/explication.


Popular posts from this blog

Mga parausang lumang sinehan

NAG DESISYON na ang Korte Suprema na labag sa Konstitusyon ang ordinansa na nagbabawal ng short time sa mga motel sa siyudad ng Maynila.

Wala na ring balak pa umanong maghain ng apela si mayor Alfredo Lim sa naturang desisyon.

Nagbabala naman si Lim na handa niyang ipasara ang anumang motel sa lungsod ng Maynila sakaling may makita sila na pinapayagan na magpapasok ng mga estudyante para magshort time.
Pero, teka, ito talaga ang pakay ko, ang mga lumang sinehan sa Metro Manila.

Taong 2005, balak ko na itong iparating sa dati kong boss na Kongresista, ang patuloy na pamamayagpag ng mga lumang sinehan sa Maynila. Subalit, may tila tinik sa aking lalamunan na nakabara. Tila, wala akong boses sa tuwing ako ay maghahanda sa aking mga sasabihin. Tila, nakagapos ang aking mga kamay para isulat ang mga hakbang na dapat kong irekomenda para masulosyunan na ito.

Alam ko, ikaw ay pamilyar ukol sa mga lumang sinehan sa buong Kamaynilaan.

Sa unang pasok ko sa ganitong sinehan, ako ay tuwang tuwa. Napan…


NGAYON ANG IKA 111st NA ANIBERSARYO NG ARAW NG KALAYAAN NG PILIPINAS. Ngunit, sa paglipas ng isang daan at labing isang taon, tunay nga ba tayong malaya na?

May mga pagkakataong gusto kong isipin na hindi na tayo nakagapos sa mga bansang banyaga dahil nagkaroon na tayo ng kalayaan sa pamamalakad ng gobyerno. Ngunit, ano ang kalagayan ng mga Pilipino ngayon? Mayroon na nga ba siyang dangal na matatawag? Taas noo na nga ba ang bawat Pilipino kahit kanino?

Sa mga nakalipas na araw, samu’t saring problema ang dinaranas ng ating bansa. Mga problemang lalong nagpapalugmok ng bawat mamamayan. Mga problemang animo’y walang katapusan. Paano babangon ang isang Juan dela Cruz kung mismong mga namumuno sa ating bayan ang nagbabangayan? Paano tayo makakalaya kong mismong mga halal ng bayan ang siyang nanguna upang itali ang bawat mahihirap na pinoy sa kanilang pamamahala?Paano na ang walang tigil na pagbulusok ng presyo ng mga pangunahing bilihin? Ang walang humpay na pagtaas ng gasolina. Paano pa m…

Ang Kondisyon ng HIV at AIDS sa Pilipinas

Akda ni Marlon Lacsamana

Taong 1984 ng sa kauna-unahang pagkakataon ay mayroong naitala na Pilipino sa Philippine’s National AIDS Registry ng Department of Health (DOH). Mula noon, umaabot na sa 3,589 ang nakalista na may HIV hanggang Disyembre ng 2008. Sa bawat taon, patuloy ang pagtaas ng bilang ng mga taong nabubuhay na may HIV sa bansa. Kapansin-pansin din ang bilis ng pagdami ng mga kasong naitala sa kasalukuyang dekada kumpara noong dekada ’80s at ’90s. Mula 1984 hangang 1989 ay may kulang-kulang sa 50. Sa taong 1990 hangang 1992 mahigit 50 pero kulang sa 100 ang mga kaso sa loob ng taon. Sa taong 1993 hangang 2004, humihigit na sa 100 ang kaso. Sa taong 2006 mahigit 300 ang naitala. At sa 2008 mahigit 500. (NEC, 2008).

Tanggap na ngayon sa bansa na ang HIV ay hidden and growing. Ito ay isang pagtingin na mula na rin sa UNAIDS. Ang pagsusuring ito ay bag na sa dating paniniwala na mula lamang sa mga mosk at risk population (MARPs) – persons in prostitutions and their clients, male…